<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Vision, articulated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deepening.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/a-vision-articulated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deepening.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/a-vision-articulated/</link>
	<description>thinking about questions of authority, technology, learning, and 2.0 in academic libraries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudibrarian</title>
		<link>http://deepening.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/a-vision-articulated/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rudibrarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepening.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amanda thank you!
I struggle a lot, in general, about the phrase &quot;remain relevant&quot;. I hadn&#039;t thought of it as reactive, mainly because I don&#039;t think the work that flows from the concept is reactive (I see it as assessing and addressing trends in studenty learning). So I really appreciate the proactive rephrasing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda thank you!<br />
I struggle a lot, in general, about the phrase &#8220;remain relevant&#8221;. I hadn&#8217;t thought of it as reactive, mainly because I don&#8217;t think the work that flows from the concept is reactive (I see it as assessing and addressing trends in studenty learning). So I really appreciate the proactive rephrasing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://deepening.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/a-vision-articulated/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepening.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall, I think this is great! I just have a few comments:

On the first sentence: &quot;Creating library spaces that evolve to remain relevant to undergraduate student research &amp; study modes, while applying emerging and mature technology as useful, and leveraging the unique role of the library as a non-disciplinary academic space on campus.&quot;

Something about the phrasing &quot;remain relevant&quot; rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it&#039;s because it sounds like the library will not be relevant. Perhaps changing the wording to &quot;Creating study spaces that evolve to accommodate...&quot; or maybe &quot;enhance&quot;? Or &quot;enhance and support&quot;? I&#039;m looking for something positive and proactive that shows a forward-thinking attitude, not one that sounds reactive.

And the first bullet point - you have some parallels, but not the third element. Perhaps change to:

Addressing study space needs of undergraduate students – for example: collaborative or solo, quiet or dynamic, late night or early morning.

(We have a lot of students who want to get in some studying before classes start at 8 am, or print out a paper, but only a small portion of the library is open before then.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, I think this is great! I just have a few comments:</p>
<p>On the first sentence: &#8220;Creating library spaces that evolve to remain relevant to undergraduate student research &amp; study modes, while applying emerging and mature technology as useful, and leveraging the unique role of the library as a non-disciplinary academic space on campus.&#8221;</p>
<p>Something about the phrasing &#8220;remain relevant&#8221; rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it&#8217;s because it sounds like the library will not be relevant. Perhaps changing the wording to &#8220;Creating study spaces that evolve to accommodate&#8230;&#8221; or maybe &#8220;enhance&#8221;? Or &#8220;enhance and support&#8221;? I&#8217;m looking for something positive and proactive that shows a forward-thinking attitude, not one that sounds reactive.</p>
<p>And the first bullet point &#8211; you have some parallels, but not the third element. Perhaps change to:</p>
<p>Addressing study space needs of undergraduate students – for example: collaborative or solo, quiet or dynamic, late night or early morning.</p>
<p>(We have a lot of students who want to get in some studying before classes start at 8 am, or print out a paper, but only a small portion of the library is open before then.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
